Usage Score
37.3
Player Dossier
2013-2016Minnesota
Drew Wolitarsky
WR • 6'3" • Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Drew Wolitarsky reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.5
Consistency
79.7
Season Value
74.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Minnesota
13131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Minnesota
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Wolitarsky, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Minnesota. Drew Wolitarsky reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Minnesota paired 860 primary output with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Minnesota
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
66.2
Efficiency
82.5
Usage
37.3
Consistency
79.7
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 73. Oregon State: 53. Unknown: 125. Colorado State: 74. Penn State: 69. Iowa: 58. Maryland: 21. Rutgers: 50. Illinois: 64. Purdue: 65. Nebraska: 90. Northwestern: 42. Wisconsin: 76
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 5 by 97.3. Oregon State: 4 by 88.3. Unknown: 8 by 100. Colorado State: 5 by 98.7. Penn State: 7 by 65.7. Iowa: 5 by 77.3. Maryland: 3 by 46.7. Rutgers: 5 by 66.7. Illinois: 3 by 100. Purdue: 5 by 86.7. Nebraska: 8 by 75. Northwestern: 4 by 70. Wisconsin: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins55.3 · n=8 · -18 vs Losses
Losses73.3 · n=4 · +18 vs Wins
First Half67.6 · n=7 · +3.1 vs Second Half
Second Half64.5 · n=6 · -3.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | @ Washington State | W 17-12 | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Wisconsin | L 17-31 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Northwestern | W 29-12 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ NebraskaHigh volume | L 17-24 | — | 8 | 90 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Purdue | W 44-31 | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Illinois | W 40-17 | — | 3 | 64 | 17.8 | 21.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Rutgers | W 34-32 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Maryland | W 31-10 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Iowa | L 7-14 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Penn State | L 26-29 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Colorado State | W 31-24 | — | 5 | 74 | 11.7 | 14.80 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 125 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 2 | 21 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Oregon State | W 30-23 | — | 4 | 53 | 11.2 | 13.30 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Minnesota
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Minnesota | 259 | 93.8 | 18.3 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Minnesota | 259 | 93.8 | 18.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Minnesota | 106 | 62.2 | 29.8 | -153 |
| 2015 Postseason | Minnesota | 524 | 81.6 | 14.8 | 418 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Minnesota | 524 | 81.6 | 14.8 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Minnesota | 860 | 82.5 | 37.3 | 336 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Minnesota | 860 | 82.5 | 37.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Syracuse
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado State
114
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#4
Illinois
35
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wisconsin
76
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Minnesota
860 primary output · 82.5 efficiency · 37.3 usage
74.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Minnesota
74.9
860 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 37.3 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Minnesota
53.5
524 primary · 81.6 efficiency · 14.8 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8392
Canyon · Santa Clarita, CA
- Committed To
- Minnesota
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,749
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.