Usage Score
0.8
Player Dossier
2013-2017SMU
Jesse Montgomery
DB • 6'1" • 180 lbs • Dallas, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jesse Montgomery shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 5.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
5.6
Consistency
100
Season Value
35.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · SMU
13141517
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- SMU • UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jesse Montgomery, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · SMU. Jesse Montgomery shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 5.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
SMU paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 5.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across SMU, UTEP.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
5.6
Usage
0.8
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0. Arizona: 0. Western Kentucky: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 2 by 8.3. Arizona: 1 by 4.2. Western Kentucky: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Losses0 · n=3
First Half0 · n=2
All Games0 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
8.3 vs Oklahoma
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2013-2015
Opening stop
- 2
UTEP
2017
Final stop
Season Progression
2013201420152017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 5.6 | 0.8 | -1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Oklahoma
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.2 takeover score.
#3
Western Kentucky
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
#4
Arizona
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · SMU
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
46.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
35.4
0 primary · 5.6 efficiency · 0.8 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · SMU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7633
Madison · Dallas, TX
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
4
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.