Usage Score
5.6
Player Dossier
2013-2016SMU
Zelt Minor
DE • 6'2" • Houston, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Zelt Minor shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.6
Consistency
15.2
Season Value
15.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · SMU
13141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zelt Minor, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · SMU. Zelt Minor shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
SMU paired 7.5 primary output with 18.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 18.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · SMU
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
18.6
Usage
5.6
Consistency
15.2
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 0. Unknown: 1. TCU: 1. Temple: 1.5. Tulsa: 3. Houston: 0. Tulane: 0. Memphis: 0. East Carolina: 0. South Florida: 1. Navy: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 6 by 35. TCU: 2 by 18.3. Temple: 3 by 27.5. Tulsa: 7 by 59.2. Houston: 3 by 12.5. Tulane: 1 by 4.2. Memphis: 1 by 4.2. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3. South Florida: 1 by 14.2. Navy: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins0 · n=3 · -0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · n=7 · +0.9 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=6 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · n=5 · -0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
59.2 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs Navy | L 31-75 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs South Florida | L 27-35 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ East Carolina | W 55-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Memphis | L 7-51 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Tulane | W 35-31 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Houston | W 38-16 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ TulsaSplash game | L 40-43 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Temple | L 20-45 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs TCU | L 3-33 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Baylor | L 13-40 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | SMU | 7.5 | 18.6 | 5.6 | 7.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 59.3 takeover score.
#2
Temple
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 29.5 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.3 takeover score.
#4
TCU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 20.5 takeover score.
#5
South Florida
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 18.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · SMU
7.5 primary output · 18.6 efficiency · 5.6 usage
15.7
#2
2013 Regular Season · SMU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · SMU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8581
Lamar · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
31
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.