Usage Score
18.1
Player Dossier
2013-2017Wake Forest
TE • 6'3" • 240 lbs • Ashburn, VA, USA
Cam Serigne reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.1
Efficiency
76
Consistency
57.5
Season Value
62.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cam Serigne, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest. Cam Serigne reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Wake Forest paired 531 primary output with 63.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
50.5
Efficiency
76
Usage
18.1
Consistency
57.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 112. Unknown: 34. Utah State: 52. App State: 22. Florida State: 56. Clemson: 20. Louisville: 42. Notre Dame: 48. Syracuse: 119. NC State: 29. Duke: 22
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 9 by 83. Unknown: 2 by 100. Utah State: 2 by 100. App State: 2 by 73.3. Florida State: 3 by 100. Clemson: 3 by 44.4. Louisville: 4 by 70. Notre Dame: 5 by 64. Syracuse: 7 by 100. NC State: 3 by 64.4. Duke: 4 by 36.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
100 vs Syracuse
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ Texas A&M100 receiving yards · High volume | W 55-52 | — | 9 | 112 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Duke | L 23-31 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/19 | vs NC State | W 30-24 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Syracuse100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 64-43 | — | 7 | 119 | 17 | 17 | 3 | 31 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Notre Dame | L 37-48 | — | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Louisville | W 42-32 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Clemson | L 14-28 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Florida State | L 19-26 | — | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ App State | W 20-19 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Utah State | W 46-10 | — | 2 | 52 | 26 | 26 | 1 | 45 |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 26 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wake Forest
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 531 | 63.1 | 24.1 | 531 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 562 | 63.5 | 19.8 | 31 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wake Forest | 426 | 79.8 | 17.5 | -136 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 426 | 79.8 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wake Forest | 556 | 76 | 18.1 | 130 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 556 | 76 | 18.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68
Primary metric
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Syracuse
119
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah State
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Duke
135
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest
531 primary output · 63.1 efficiency · 24.1 usage
62.6
#2
2017 Postseason · Wake Forest
62.4
556 primary · 76 efficiency · 18.1 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Wake Forest
62.4
556 primary · 76 efficiency · 18.1 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8128
Briar Woods · Ashburn, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,075
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Cam Serigne quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit