Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2013-2017Purdue
Josh Okonye
DB • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Sugar Land, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Josh Okonye shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.2
Consistency
65.3
Season Value
32.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Purdue
13141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Wake Forest • Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Okonye, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Purdue. Josh Okonye shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.2 disruption score.
Josh Okonye played DB for Wake Forest and Purdue. Across 5 tracked seasons, Josh Okonye recorded 93 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Purdue.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Purdue paired 15.5 primary output with 30.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wake Forest, Purdue.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Purdue
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
30.2
Usage
9
Consistency
65.3
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 1. Louisville: 2. Ohio: 1. Missouri: 1. Michigan: 1. Minnesota: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Rutgers: 3.5. Nebraska: 1. Illinois: 2. Northwestern: 0. Iowa: 1. Indiana: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 1 by 14.2. Louisville: 9 by 57.5. Ohio: 4 by 26.7. Missouri: 4 by 26.7. Michigan: 8 by 43.3. Minnesota: 1 by 14.2. Wisconsin: 7 by 29.2. Rutgers: 5 by 55.8. Nebraska: 4 by 26.7. Illinois: 4 by 36.7. Northwestern: 1 by 4.2. Iowa: 5 by 30.8. Indiana: 4 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.1 · Games = 7 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 6 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half1 · Games = 7 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · Games = 6 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | vs Arizona | W 38-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Indiana | W 31-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Iowa | W 24-15 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Northwestern | L 13-23 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Illinois | W 29-10 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Nebraska | L 24-25 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ RutgersSplash game | L 12-14 | 5 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Wisconsin | L 9-17 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Minnesota | W 31-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Michigan | L 10-28 | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Missouri | W 35-3 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Ohio | W 44-21 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Louisville | L 28-35 | 9 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wake Forest
2013-2016
Opening stop
- 2
Purdue
2017
Final stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wake Forest | 3.5 | 18.5 | 2.9 | 3.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 3.5 | 18.5 | 2.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Purdue | 15.5 | 30.2 | 9 | 12 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 15.5 | 30.2 | 9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.9 takeover score.
#2
Louisville
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 56.6 takeover score.
#3
Duke
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.9 takeover score.
#4
Illinois
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 32.5 takeover score.
#5
Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 25.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Purdue
15.5 primary output · 30.2 efficiency · 9 usage
32.9
#2
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
32.9
15.5 primary · 30.2 efficiency · 9 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Wake Forest
9.4
3.5 primary · 18.5 efficiency · 2.9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7931
George Ranch · Rosenberg, TX
- Committed To
- Wake Forest
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
93
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.