Usage Score
29.6
Player Dossier
2013-2016North Carolina
Ryan Switzer
WR • 5'10" • Charleston, WV, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Ryan Switzer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.1
Consistency
56.4
Season Value
64
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · North Carolina
1313141415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- North Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryan Switzer, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · North Carolina. Ryan Switzer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
North Carolina paired 1,112 primary output with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · North Carolina
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
85.5
Efficiency
70.1
Usage
29.6
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 85. Georgia: 52. Illinois: 68. Unknown: 101. Pittsburgh: 208. Florida State: 158. Virginia Tech: 2. Miami: 17. Virginia: 72. Georgia Tech: 50. Duke: 35. Unknown: 93. NC State: 171
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 5 by 100. Georgia: 7 by 49.5. Illinois: 5 by 90.7. Unknown: 5 by 100. Pittsburgh: 16 by 86.7. Florida State: 14 by 75.2. Virginia Tech: 2 by 6.7. Miami: 9 by 12.6. Virginia: 8 by 60. Georgia Tech: 4 by 83.3. Duke: 4 by 58.3. Unknown: 4 by 100. NC State: 13 by 87.7
Split Comparison
Wins95.5 · n=6 · +26.5 vs Losses
Losses69 · n=5 · -26.5 vs Wins
First Half96.3 · n=7 · +23.3 vs Second Half
Second Half73 · n=6 · -23.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Stanford | L 23-25 | — | 5 | 85 | 14.7 | 17 | 1 | 28 |
| Fri 11/25 | vs NC State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-28 | — | 13 | 171 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 93 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 1 | 72 |
| Fri 11/11 | @ Duke | L 27-28 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Georgia Tech | W 48-20 | — | 4 | 50 | 10.8 | 12.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ VirginiaHigh volume | W 35-14 | — | 8 | 72 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ MiamiHigh volume | W 20-13 | — | 9 | 17 | 1.9 | 1.90 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Virginia Tech | L 3-34 | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Florida State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-35 | — | 14 | 158 | 11 | 11.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-36 | — | 16 | 208 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Illinois | W 48-23 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Georgia | L 24-33 | — | 7 | 52 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
North Carolina
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132013201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | North Carolina | 341 | 62.2 | 12.4 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | North Carolina | 341 | 62.2 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | North Carolina | 757 | 73.7 | 19.4 | 416 |
| 2014 Regular Season | North Carolina | 757 | 73.7 | 19.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | North Carolina | 697 | 74.7 | 23.1 | -60 |
| 2015 Regular Season | North Carolina | 697 | 74.7 | 23.1 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | North Carolina | 1,112 | 70.1 | 29.6 | 415 |
| 2016 Regular Season | North Carolina | 1,112 | 70.1 | 29.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126
Primary metric
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
208
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
208 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
NC State
171
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
171 receiving yards with a 87.7 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
118
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia Tech
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · North Carolina
1,112 primary output · 70.1 efficiency · 29.6 usage
64
#2
2016 Regular Season · North Carolina
64
1,112 primary · 70.1 efficiency · 29.6 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · North Carolina
57
757 primary · 73.7 efficiency · 19.4 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8736
George Washington · Charleston, WV
- Committed To
- North Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,907
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 53 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.