Player Stats

Mike Davis College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,195
Rushing yards
2,440
Receiving yards
755
Touchdowns
24

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 PostseasonSouth Carolina12505032.3
2012 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina1230527530232.3
2013 PostseasonSouth Carolina12594910084.8
2013 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina121,4761,1343421184.8
2014 PostseasonSouth Carolina13745519174.5
2014 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina131,2769273491074.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

South Carolina paired 1,535 primary output with 62 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · South Carolina

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

103.8

Efficiency

55.1

Usage

30

Consistency

69.3

Best Game by takeover score

Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 74. Texas A&M: 16. East Carolina: 129. Georgia: 82. Vanderbilt: 112. Missouri: 135. Kentucky: 191. Furman: 135. Auburn: 173. Tennessee: 103. Florida: 79. South Alabama: 54. Clemson: 67

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 15 by 47. Texas A&M: 7 by 25.1. East Carolina: 21 by 60.7. Georgia: 19 by 42.2. Vanderbilt: 21 by 52.4. Missouri: 24 by 53. Kentucky: 25 by 81.6. Furman: 19 by 68.1. Auburn: 27 by 52.9. Tennessee: 17 by 52.2. Florida: 17 by 42.7. South Alabama: 3 by 100. Clemson: 16 by 37.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins95 · Games = 7 · -19.2 vs Losses
Losses114.2 · Games = 6 · +19.2 vs Wins