Player Stats

C.J. Davidson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
568
Rushing yards
468
Receiving yards
100
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonClemson1550034.1
2013 PostseasonClemson530327050.5
2013 Regular SeasonClemson516515213450.5
2014 PostseasonClemson11330054.5
2014 Regular SeasonClemson1130524560354.5
2015 Regular SeasonClemson660600029.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Clemson paired 308 primary output with 36.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 26.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wofford

Win with 25 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Clemson

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

10

Efficiency

26.5

Usage

5.5

Consistency

55.6

Best Game by takeover score

Wofford

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wofford: 25. App State: 14. Louisville: 9. Georgia Tech: 17. Miami: -2. Wake Forest: -3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wofford: 5 by 52.1. App State: 6 by 24.3. Louisville: 4 by 23.4. Georgia Tech: 3 by 59. Miami: 2 by 0. Wake Forest: 2 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half16 · Games = 3 · +12 vs Second Half
Second Half4 · Games = 3 · -12 vs First Half