Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Georgia Southern paired 49 primary output with 58 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Arkansas State | 2 | - | 0 | 0 | 60.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 2 | 1 | 33 | 0 | 60.3 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 11 | 5 | 42 | 0 | 52.3 |
| 2015 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 13 | - | 0 | 0 | 65.2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 13 | 6 | 49 | 1 | 65.2 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Georgia Southern paired 49 primary output with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas State, Georgia Southern.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
3.8
Efficiency
58
Usage
27.7
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
South Alabama
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 0. West Virginia: 17. Western Michigan: 0. The Citadel: -14. Idaho: 4. UL Monroe: 0. New Mexico State: 0. App State: 19. Texas State: 0. Troy: 0. Georgia: 0. South Alabama: 23. Georgia State: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 1 by 100. The Citadel: 1 by 0. Idaho: 1 by 26.7. App State: 2 by 63.3. South Alabama: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.