Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 1,291 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Arkansas State | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 3 | 52 | 45 | 7 | 0 | 31.3 |
| 2013 Postseason | Arkansas State | 12 | 37 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 58.4 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 12 | 923 | 717 | 206 | 11 | 58.4 |
| 2014 Postseason | Arkansas State | 11 | 47 | 36 | 11 | 0 | 77 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 11 | 1,244 | 1,064 | 180 | 14 | 77 |
| 2015 Postseason | Arkansas State | 13 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 67 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 13 | 1,136 | 1,055 | 81 | 11 | 67 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 1,291 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 59.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Idaho
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
87.6
Efficiency
59.3
Usage
22.2
Consistency
56.9
Best Game by takeover score
Idaho
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 3. USC: 64. Missouri: 64. Missouri State: 96. Toledo: 27. Idaho: 221. South Alabama: 44. Louisiana: 73. Georgia State: 63. App State: 145. UL Monroe: 86. New Mexico State: 75. Texas State: 178
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 15.6. USC: 12 by 52.3. Missouri: 18 by 39.4. Missouri State: 10 by 90. Toledo: 8 by 33.7. Idaho: 25 by 86.8. South Alabama: 7 by 62.6. Louisiana: 14 by 54.3. Georgia State: 17 by 41.8. App State: 18 by 83.6. UL Monroe: 15 by 59.5. New Mexico State: 11 by 71. Texas State: 22 by 80
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.