Usage Score
17.5
Player Dossier
2012-2015Rutgers
Ruhann Peele
WR • 6'1" • Linden, NJ, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Ruhann Peele reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
58
Consistency
49.6
Season Value
56.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Rutgers
1213131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ruhann Peele, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Rutgers. Ruhann Peele reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Ruhann Peele played WR for Rutgers. Across 4 tracked seasons, Ruhann Peele recorded 281 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Rutgers.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Rutgers paired 281 primary output with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
28.1
Efficiency
58
Usage
17.5
Consistency
49.6
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 3. Fresno State: 31. Unknown: 25. Arkansas: 18. SMU: 21. Louisville: 58. Houston: 10. Cincinnati: 0. UConn: 79. South Florida: 36
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 2 by 10. Fresno State: 4 by 51.7. Unknown: 2 by 83.3. Arkansas: 2 by 60. SMU: 3 by 46.7. Louisville: 5 by 77.3. Houston: 2 by 33.3. UConn: 4 by 100. South Florida: 4 by 60
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins25 · Games = 3 · -5.2 vs Losses
Losses30.2 · Games = 6 · +5.2 vs Wins
First Half19.6 · Games = 5 · -17 vs Second Half
Second Half36.6 · Games = 5 · +17 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UConn
Best efficiency game
100 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Notre Dame | L 16-29 | — | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 1.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 12/8 | vs South Florida | W 31-6 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ UConn | L 17-28 | — | 4 | 79 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Cincinnati | L 17-52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Houston | L 14-49 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 10/10 | @ Louisville | L 10-24 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ SMU | W 55-52 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Arkansas | W 28-24 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Fresno State | L 51-52 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Rutgers | 281 | 58 | 17.5 | 281 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 281 | 58 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | -281 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UConn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79
Primary metric
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisville
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
25
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#4
South Florida
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Fresno State
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 51.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
281 primary output · 58 efficiency · 17.5 usage
56.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
56.3
281 primary · 58 efficiency · 17.5 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8853
Linden · Linden, NJ
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
281
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.