Usage Score
0.4
Player Dossier
2012-2015Massachusetts
TE • 6'3" • Lakeville, MA, USA
A.J. Doyle reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
0.4
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
50.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Doyle, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts. A.J. Doyle reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Massachusetts paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
0.4
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 0. Unknown: 0. Kansas State: 0. Vanderbilt: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Buffalo: 0. Western Michigan: 0. Akron: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Ohio: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
— vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Ohio | L 23-51 | — | — | — | 0.9 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Central Michigan | L 0-37 | — | — | — | 1.3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Akron | L 13-14 | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Western Michigan | L 30-31 | — | — | — | 0.5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Buffalo | L 3-32 | — | — | — | 2.4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Miami (OH) | W 17-10 | — | — | — | 2.4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Bowling Green | L 7-28 | — | — | — | 4.6 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Vanderbilt | L 7-24 | — | — | — | 3.6 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Kansas State | L 7-37 | — | — | — | 4.1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | -3.5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-45 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Massachusetts
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 0 | — | 0.4 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0
Primary metric
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#3
Vanderbilt
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2013 Regular Season · Massachusetts
50.2
0 primary · — efficiency · 0.4 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Massachusetts
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
A.J. Doyle quick answers