Usage Score
41.1
Player Dossier
2012-2015Massachusetts
Tajae Sharpe
WR • 6'3" • Piscataway, NJ, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Tajae Sharpe reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.7
Consistency
70.3
Season Value
72
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Massachusetts
12131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Massachusetts
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tajae Sharpe, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Massachusetts. Tajae Sharpe reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Massachusetts paired 1,319 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 66.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Massachusetts
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
109.9
Efficiency
76.7
Usage
41.1
Consistency
70.3
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado: 138. Temple: 156. Notre Dame: 83. Florida International: 159. Bowling Green: 156. Kent State: 46. Toledo: 159. Ball State: 83. Akron: 53. Eastern Michigan: 67. Miami (OH): 81. Buffalo: 138
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado: 11 by 83.6. Temple: 11 by 94.5. Notre Dame: 8 by 69.2. Florida International: 15 by 70.7. Bowling Green: 13 by 80. Kent State: 7 by 43.8. Toledo: 12 by 88.3. Ball State: 11 by 50.3. Akron: 7 by 50.5. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 6 by 90. Buffalo: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins121.3 · n=3 · +15.2 vs Losses
Losses106.1 · n=9 · -15.2 vs Wins
First Half123 · n=6 · +26.2 vs Second Half
Second Half96.8 · n=6 · -26.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards | W 31-26 | — | 6 | 138 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Miami (OH) | L 13-20 | — | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 28-17 | — | 4 | 67 | 12.8 | 16.80 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Akron | L 13-17 | — | 7 | 53 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Ball StateHigh volume | L 10-20 | — | 11 | 83 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-51 | — | 12 | 159 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 2 | 35 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Kent State | L 10-15 | — | 7 | 46 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Bowling Green100 receiving yards · High volume | L 38-62 | — | 13 | 156 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Florida International100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-14 | — | 15 | 159 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Notre DameHigh volume | L 27-62 | — | 8 | 83 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Temple100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-25 | — | 11 | 156 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Colorado100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-48 | — | 11 | 138 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 41 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Massachusetts
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 206 | 64.7 | 10 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 680 | 75.4 | 35.1 | 474 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 1,281 | 83.4 | 31 | 601 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 1,319 | 76.7 | 41.1 | 38 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138
Primary metric
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ball State
239
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
239 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 89.5 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
159
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
159 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
156
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
156 receiving yards with a 94.5 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Massachusetts
1,319 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 41.1 usage
72
#2
2014 Regular Season · Massachusetts
66.9
1,281 primary · 83.4 efficiency · 31 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Massachusetts
58.2
680 primary · 75.4 efficiency · 35.1 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
14
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8359
Piscataway · Piscataway, NJ
- Committed To
- Massachusetts
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
3,486
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.