Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
East Carolina paired 1,605 primary output with 53.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Vintavious Cooper College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 2,883
- Rushing yards
- 2,242
- Receiving yards
- 641
- Touchdowns
- 22
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | East Carolina | 13 | 22 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 67.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | East Carolina | 13 | 1,256 | 1,030 | 226 | 8 | 67.3 |
| 2013 Postseason | East Carolina | 13 | 220 | 198 | 22 | 2 | 79.3 |
| 2013 Regular Season | East Carolina | 13 | 1,385 | 995 | 390 | 12 | 79.3 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 53.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · East Carolina
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
123.5
Efficiency
53.9
Usage
32.8
Consistency
69.7
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 220. Old Dominion: 52. Florida Atlantic: 144. Virginia Tech: 80. North Carolina: 256. Middle Tennessee: 26. Tulane: 171. Southern Miss: 73. Florida International: 61. Tulsa: 108. UAB: 126. NC State: 164. Marshall: 124
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 28 by 82.2. Old Dominion: 14 by 35.3. Florida Atlantic: 25 by 53.7. Virginia Tech: 13 by 47.5. North Carolina: 43 by 58. Middle Tennessee: 8 by 39.6. Tulane: 28 by 50.2. Southern Miss: 16 by 43.1. Florida International: 16 by 37.3. Tulsa: 19 by 48.3. UAB: 15 by 85. NC State: 24 by 70.5. Marshall: 25 by 49.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins123 · Games = 10 · -2 vs Losses
Losses125 · Games = 3 · +2 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Vintavious Cooper
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.