Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2012UTEP
RB • 5'11" • Carrolton, TX, USA
Xay Williams leans balanced backfield option traits and 46.4 efficiency.
Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
15
Developing production for a back
Reliability
14
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
30
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Xay Williams, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · UTEP. Xay Williams leans balanced backfield option traits and 46.4 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 6 | 94 | 89 | 5 | 1 | 49.2 |
Related Context
Xay Williams played RB for UTEP. Across 1 tracked season, Xay Williams recorded 89 rushing yards, 5 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
UTEP paired 94 primary output with 46.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 46.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with 53 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
15.7
Efficiency
46.4
Usage
8.1
Consistency
27.1
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 16. Ole Miss: 4. New Mexico State: 6. Wisconsin: 53. East Carolina: 7. Tulane: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 5 by 33.3. Ole Miss: 7 by 6. New Mexico State: 1 by 62.5. Wisconsin: 8 by 69. East Carolina: 3 by 41. Tulane: 1 by 66.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
69 vs Wisconsin
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 94 | 46.4 | 8.1 | — |
#1 Featured game
@ Wisconsin
Week 4 · L 26-37
Loss with 53 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
53
Scrimmage Yards
70.1 takeover
53 scrimmage yards and 14.5 usage.
#2
vs Oklahoma
Week 1 · L 7-24
16
Scrimmage Yards
32.2 takeover
Loss with 16 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
16 scrimmage yards and 11.6 usage.
#3
vs Tulane
Week 8 · W 24-20 · Conference game
8
Scrimmage Yards
28.9 takeover
Win with 8 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
8 scrimmage yards and 1.7 usage.
#4
vs New Mexico State
Week 3 · W 41-28
6
Scrimmage Yards
26.2 takeover
Win with 6 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
6 scrimmage yards and 1.7 usage.
#5
@ East Carolina
Week 5 · L 18-28 · Conference game
7
Scrimmage Yards
24.4 takeover
Loss with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
7 scrimmage yards and 6.7 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
94 primary output · 46.4 efficiency · 8.1 usage
49.2
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.