Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2012-2013Houston
WR • 6'1" • Humble, TX, USA
Xavier Maxwell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.2
Efficiency
70.5
Consistency
36.9
Season Value
54.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Xavier Maxwell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Houston. Xavier Maxwell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Xavier Maxwell played WR for Houston. Across 2 tracked seasons, Xavier Maxwell recorded 584 receiving yards and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Houston.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Houston paired 405 primary output with 70.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
36.8
Efficiency
70.5
Usage
10.2
Consistency
36.9
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 24. Temple: 75. Rice: 3. UTSA: 42. Memphis: 33. BYU: 136. South Florida: 13. UCF: 21. Louisville: 5. Cincinnati: 36. SMU: 17
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 53.3. Temple: 8 by 62.5. Rice: 1 by 20. UTSA: 3 by 93.3. Memphis: 1 by 100. BYU: 5 by 100. South Florida: 2 by 43.3. UCF: 2 by 70. Louisville: 1 by 33.3. Cincinnati: 1 by 100. SMU: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | vs SMU | W 34-0 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Cincinnati | L 17-24 | — | 1 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 36 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Louisville | L 13-20 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ UCF | L 14-19 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 10/31 | vs South Florida | W 35-23 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs BYU100 receiving yards | L 46-47 | — | 5 | 136 | 27.2 | 27.20 | 1 | 69 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Memphis | W 25-15 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ UTSA2+ TD | W 59-28 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Rice | W 31-26 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ TempleHigh volume | W 22-13 | — | 8 | 75 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 17 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Houston | 179 | 82 | 8.8 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 405 | 70.5 | 10.2 | 226 |
#1 Featured game
BYU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
136
Primary metric
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulane
54
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 62.5 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Houston
405 primary output · 70.5 efficiency · 10.2 usage
54.1
#2
2012 Regular Season · Houston
50.2
179 primary · 82 efficiency · 8.8 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7
Humble · Humble, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
584
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.