Player Stats

Ryan Jackson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,638
Rushing yards
1,930
Receiving yards
708
Touchdowns
23

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonHouston11354252102435.3
2013 PostseasonHouston1332626071
2013 Regular SeasonHouston13925655270871
2014 PostseasonHouston13501337059.7
2014 Regular SeasonHouston13759597162759.7
2015 PostseasonHouston10865432152.4
2015 Regular SeasonHouston1043235379352.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

Houston paired 957 primary output with 50.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 52.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida State

Win with 86 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Houston

Games

10

Scrimmage Yards / G

51.8

Efficiency

52.9

Usage

13.5

Consistency

63.9

Best Game by takeover score

Florida State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 86. Tennessee Tech: 38. Louisville: 13. Texas State: 78. Tulsa: 36. SMU: 54. Tulane: 36. UCF: 75. Vanderbilt: 25. Cincinnati: 77

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 21 by 38.2. Tennessee Tech: 8 by 44.8. Louisville: 3 by 45.1. Texas State: 10 by 81.3. Tulsa: 4 by 56.3. SMU: 11 by 53.6. Tulane: 9 by 43.2. UCF: 9 by 84.7. Vanderbilt: 5 by 38. Cincinnati: 16 by 43.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half50.2 · Games = 5 · -3.2 vs Second Half
Second Half53.4 · Games = 5 · +3.2 vs First Half