Usage Score
25.5
Player Dossier
2012-2014Houston
Deontay Greenberry
WR • 6'3" • Fresno, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Deontay Greenberry reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.9
Consistency
67
Season Value
59.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Houston
1213131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deontay Greenberry, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Houston. Deontay Greenberry reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Houston paired 1,202 primary output with 86.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Houston
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
64.7
Efficiency
70.9
Usage
25.5
Consistency
67
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 85. UTSA: 96. Unknown: 110. BYU: 74. UNLV: 17. UCF: 26. Memphis: 79. Temple: 63. South Florida: 1. Tulane: 130. Tulsa: 21. SMU: 36. Cincinnati: 103
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 4 by 100. UTSA: 6 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 100. BYU: 6 by 82.2. UNLV: 1 by 100. UCF: 3 by 57.8. Memphis: 5 by 100. Temple: 10 by 42. South Florida: 3 by 2.2. Tulane: 11 by 78.8. Tulsa: 4 by 35. SMU: 5 by 48. Cincinnati: 9 by 76.3
Split Comparison
Wins43.1 · n=7 · -42.7 vs Losses
Losses85.8 · n=5 · +42.7 vs Wins
First Half69.6 · n=7 · +10.6 vs Second Half
Second Half59 · n=6 · -10.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | @ Pittsburgh2+ TD | W 35-34 | — | 4 | 85 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 2 | 38 |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Cincinnati100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-38 | — | 9 | 103 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 31 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ SMU | W 35-9 | — | 5 | 36 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Tulsa | W 38-28 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Tulane100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-31 | — | 11 | 130 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ South Florida | W 27-3 | — | 3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs TempleHigh volume | W 31-10 | — | 10 | 63 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Memphis | W 28-24 | — | 5 | 79 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 10/2 | vs UCF | L 12-17 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/21 | vs UNLV | W 47-14 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 9/12 | @ BYU2+ TD | L 25-33 | — | 6 | 74 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 22 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 5 | 110 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 67 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | L 7-27 | — | 6 | 96 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Houston | 569 | 72.8 | 15.5 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Houston | 1,202 | 86.1 | 31.3 | 633 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 1,202 | 86.1 | 31.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Houston | 841 | 70.9 | 25.5 | -361 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 841 | 70.9 | 25.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
168
Primary metric
168 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
165
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
165 receiving yards with a 78.6 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
149
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
146
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
110
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Houston
1,202 primary output · 86.1 efficiency · 31.3 usage
72.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · Houston
72.4
1,202 primary · 86.1 efficiency · 31.3 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Houston
59.6
841 primary · 70.9 efficiency · 25.5 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9803
Washington Union · Fresno, CA
- Committed To
- Houston
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,612
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.