Usage Score
6.1
Player Dossier
2012-2015Rice
Luke Turner
RB • 6'1" • Gilmer, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Luke Turner leans balanced backfield option traits and 51.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
51.5
Consistency
64.9
Season Value
52.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Rice
12121313141415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Luke Turner, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Rice. Luke Turner leans balanced backfield option traits and 51.5 efficiency.
Luke Turner played RB for Rice. Across 4 tracked seasons, Luke Turner recorded 158 passing yards, 503 rushing yards, and 244 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Rice.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Rice paired 221 primary output with 51.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with 58 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Rice
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
22.1
Efficiency
51.5
Usage
6.1
Consistency
64.9
Best Game by takeover score
Charlotte
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 21. Texas: 34. North Texas: 32. Western Kentucky: 23. Florida Atlantic: 0. Army: 19. UTEP: 26. Southern Miss: 8. UTSA: 0. Charlotte: 58
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 36.5. Texas: 3 by 59.7. North Texas: 3 by 60.1. Western Kentucky: 3 by 44.4. Army: 4 by 26. UTEP: 2 by 68.8. Southern Miss: 1 by 83.3. Charlotte: 18 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins27.3 · Games = 4 · +9.1 vs Losses
Losses18.2 · Games = 5 · -9.1 vs Wins
First Half22 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half22.2 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Charlotte | W 27-7 | 17 | 54 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3.2 |
| Sun 11/22 | @ UTSA | L 24-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Southern Miss | L 10-65 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | — | — | 8 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ UTEP2+ TD | L 21-24 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 13 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Army | W 38-31 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 27-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Western Kentucky | L 10-49 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 7.7 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ North Texas | W 38-24 | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 10.7 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ Texas | L 28-42 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 32 | 11.3 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | 6 | 21 | 3.50 | 2 | — | — | 3.5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201220132013201420142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Rice | 146 | 30.5 | 5.2 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rice | 146 | 30.5 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rice | 164 | 37.1 | 5.5 | 18 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 164 | 37.1 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Rice | 216 | 36.5 | 5.7 | 52 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rice | 216 | 36.5 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 221 | 51.5 | 6.1 | 5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Old Dominion
Loss with 57 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
57
Primary metric
57 scrimmage yards and 8 usage.
#2
Louisiana Tech
76
Primary metric
Win with 76 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
76 scrimmage yards and 11.1 usage.
#3
Tulsa
102
Primary metric
Loss with 102 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
102 scrimmage yards and 22.4 usage.
#4
Fresno State
42
Primary metric
Win with 42 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
42 scrimmage yards and 11.1 usage.
#5
Charlotte
58
Primary metric
Win with 58 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
58 scrimmage yards and 24 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Rice
221 primary output · 51.5 efficiency · 6.1 usage
52.5
#2
2014 Postseason · Rice
44.8
216 primary · 36.5 efficiency · 5.7 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Rice
44.8
216 primary · 36.5 efficiency · 5.7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8267
Gilmer · Gilmer, TX
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
747
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.