Usage Score
12.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016Houston
WR • 5'9" • Allen, TX, USA
Andrew Rodriguez reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.4
Efficiency
66.8
Consistency
28.6
Season Value
51.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Rodriguez, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Houston. Andrew Rodriguez reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Houston paired 82 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Houston, Utah State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boise State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
23.8
Efficiency
66.8
Usage
12.4
Consistency
28.6
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 9. USC: 11. Arkansas State: 1. Air Force: 64. Boise State: 89. Colorado State: 0. Fresno State: 26. San Diego State: 18. Wyoming: 8. New Mexico: 46. Nevada: 0. BYU: 14
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 60. USC: 2 by 36.7. Arkansas State: 1 by 6.7. Air Force: 7 by 61. Boise State: 6 by 98.9. Fresno State: 3 by 57.8. San Diego State: 1 by 100. Wyoming: 1 by 53.3. New Mexico: 3 by 100. BYU: 1 by 93.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boise State
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ BYU | L 10-28 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Nevada | L 37-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | vs New Mexico | L 21-24 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 11/6 | @ Wyoming | L 28-52 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs San Diego State | L 13-40 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Fresno State | W 38-20 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ Colorado State | L 24-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/2 | @ Boise State | L 10-21 | — | 6 | 89 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Air Force | L 20-27 | — | 7 | 64 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Arkansas State | W 34-20 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ USC | L 7-45 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2012-2013
Opening stop
Utah State
2014-2016
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Houston | 82 | 100 | 9.4 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 88 | 70 | 8.7 | 6 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Utah State | 0 | — | — | -88 |
| 2015 Postseason | Utah State | 281 | 59.1 | 12.7 | 281 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah State | 281 | 59.1 | 12.7 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Utah State | 286 | 66.8 | 12.4 | 5 |
#1 Featured game
BYU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78
Primary metric
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Boise State
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 98.9 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico
48
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Houston
82 primary output · 100 efficiency · 9.4 usage
59.5
#2
2015 Postseason · Utah State
52.5
281 primary · 59.1 efficiency · 12.7 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Utah State
52.5
281 primary · 59.1 efficiency · 12.7 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7333
Allen · Allen, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
737
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Andrew Rodriguez quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit