Usage Score
10.3
Player Dossier
2012-2015SMU
Prescott Line
RB • 6'0" • Oxford, MI, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Prescott Line leans balanced backfield option traits and 31.3 efficiency.
Efficiency
31.3
Consistency
63.7
Season Value
41.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · SMU
12131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Prescott Line, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · SMU. Prescott Line leans balanced backfield option traits and 31.3 efficiency.
Prescott Line played RB for SMU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Prescott Line recorded 774 rushing yards, 148 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with SMU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
SMU paired 388 primary output with 36.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 31.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with 42 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · SMU
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
21.5
Efficiency
31.3
Usage
10.3
Consistency
63.7
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 35. North Texas: 27. TCU: 3. Unknown: 5. East Carolina: 2. Houston: 30. Tulsa: 42. Temple: 31. Navy: 13. Tulane: 34. Memphis: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 10 by 31.3. North Texas: 10 by 28.1. TCU: 3 by 10.4. Unknown: 2 by 26. East Carolina: 2 by 10.4. Houston: 6 by 43.3. Tulsa: 10 by 40.4. Temple: 6 by 48.1. Navy: 5 by 27.1. Tulane: 7 by 50.6. Memphis: 5 by 28.1
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins30.5 · Games = 2 · +9.1 vs Losses
Losses21.4 · Games = 8 · -9.1 vs Wins
First Half17 · Games = 6 · -10 vs Second Half
Second Half27 · Games = 5 · +10 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
50.6 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | @ Memphis | L 0-63 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Tulane | W 49-21 | 7 | 34 | 4.90 | 1 | — | — | 4.9 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Navy | L 14-55 | 5 | 13 | 2.60 | 0 | — | — | 2.6 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Temple | L 40-60 | 4 | 17 | 4.30 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 5.2 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Tulsa | L 31-40 | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 4.2 |
| Fri 10/9 | @ Houston | L 28-49 | 5 | 18 | 3.60 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 5 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs East Carolina | L 23-49 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ TCU | L 37-56 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs North Texas | W 31-13 | 10 | 27 | 2.70 | 0 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Fri 9/4 | vs Baylor | L 21-56 | 9 | 24 | 2.70 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3.5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 388 | 36.5 | 14.6 | 388 |
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 297 | 30.9 | 16.3 | -91 |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 237 | 31.3 | 10.3 | -60 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
96
Primary metric
96 scrimmage yards and 35 usage.
#2
Houston
87
Primary metric
Loss with 87 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
87 scrimmage yards and 30 usage.
#3
Tulsa
42
Primary metric
Loss with 42 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
42 scrimmage yards and 18.2 usage.
#4
Temple
54
Primary metric
Win with 54 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
54 scrimmage yards and 10.9 usage.
#5
Tulane
34
Primary metric
Win with 34 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
34 scrimmage yards and 11.5 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · SMU
388 primary output · 36.5 efficiency · 14.6 usage
51.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · SMU
41.4
237 primary · 31.3 efficiency · 10.3 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · SMU
39.7
297 primary · 30.9 efficiency · 16.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8267
Oxford · Oxford, MI
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
922
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.