Player Stats

Butch Pau'u College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
179
TFL
10.5
Sacks
1.5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonBYU00-0--0-
2013 Regular SeasonBYU00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonBYU00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonBYU00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonBYU1011-0--070.7
2016 Regular SeasonBYU107271.51-070.7
2017 Regular SeasonBYU11743012052.5
2018 Regular SeasonBYU4220.50--022.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

BYU paired 10.5 primary output with 42.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 24.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Washington

Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · BYU

Games

4

Havoc Plays / G

0.1

Efficiency

24.2

Usage

6.3

Consistency

8.3

Best Game by takeover score

Washington

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 0. California: 0. Washington: 0.5. Utah State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 7 by 29.2. California: 5 by 20.8. Washington: 7 by 34.2. Utah State: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 1 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · Games = 3 · +0.2 vs Wins