Player Stats

Brayden El-Bakri College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
298
Rushing yards
75
Receiving yards
223
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonBYU00000-
2013 Regular SeasonBYU00000-
2014 Regular SeasonBYU00000-
2015 Regular SeasonBYU00000-
2016 Regular SeasonBYU690288133.7
2017 Regular SeasonBYU101476780255.5
2018 PostseasonBYU8660131.2
2018 Regular SeasonBYU855055131.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

BYU paired 147 primary output with 48 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 43.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Boise State

Loss with 21 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · BYU

Games

8

Scrimmage Yards / G

7.6

Efficiency

43.6

Usage

2.7

Consistency

32.2

Best Game by takeover score

Boise State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 6. Arizona: 19. California: 1. Utah State: 3. Hawai'i: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Boise State: 21. Utah: 11

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 4 by 15.6. Arizona: 2 by 79.2. California: 1 by 8.3. Utah State: 1 by 25. Boise State: 2 by 87.5. Utah: 2 by 45.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins8.3 · Games = 3 · +1.1 vs Losses
Losses7.2 · Games = 5 · -1.1 vs Wins