Player Stats

Jaylen Walton College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,706
Rushing yards
1,957
Receiving yards
749
Touchdowns
23

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 PostseasonOle Miss1356560022.4
2012 Regular SeasonOle Miss131196257322.4
2013 PostseasonOle Miss1356533062.9
2013 Regular SeasonOle Miss13789470319862.9
2014 PostseasonOle Miss13835062.4
2014 Regular SeasonOle Miss13784583201762.4
2015 PostseasonOle Miss123840-2069.8
2015 Regular SeasonOle Miss12856690166569.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Ole Miss paired 894 primary output with 53.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 53.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Ole Miss

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

74.5

Efficiency

53.6

Usage

22.6

Consistency

60.9

Best Game by takeover score

Vanderbilt

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 38. UT Martin: 77. Fresno State: 54. Alabama: 35. Vanderbilt: 134. Florida: 41. Memphis: 39. Texas A&M: 117. Auburn: 125. Arkansas: 93. LSU: 14. Mississippi State: 127

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 9 by 48.8. UT Martin: 4 by 100. Fresno State: 8 by 67.7. Alabama: 14 by 27.6. Vanderbilt: 22 by 65. Florida: 11 by 31.5. Memphis: 8 by 55.1. Texas A&M: 24 by 47.9. Auburn: 23 by 47. Arkansas: 15 by 62.4. LSU: 6 by 28.5. Mississippi State: 21 by 61.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins80.1 · Games = 9 · +22.4 vs Losses
Losses57.7 · Games = 3 · -22.4 vs Wins