Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTSA
TE • 6'3" • Friendswood, TX, USA
Trevor Stevens reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9
Efficiency
53.3
Consistency
22.5
Season Value
46.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trevor Stevens, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · UTSA. Trevor Stevens reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
UTSA paired 73 primary output with 53.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 53.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
14.6
Efficiency
53.3
Usage
9
Consistency
22.5
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 16. Unknown: 47. Southern Miss: 3. Rice: 3. Texas A&M: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 1 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 20. Rice: 1 by 20. Texas A&M: 1 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 9 | 60 | 4.5 | 9 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | -9 |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 73 | 53.3 | 9 | 73 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 73 | 53.3 | 9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas A&M
4
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
3
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · UTSA
73 primary output · 53.3 efficiency · 9 usage
46.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
46.2
73 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 9 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
45
9 primary · 60 efficiency · 4.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8488
Friendswood · Friendswood, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
82
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Trevor Stevens quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit