Usage Score
19.4
Player Dossier
2012-2015Notre Dame
Chris Brown
WR • 6'1" • Hanahan, SC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chris Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.3
Consistency
60.7
Season Value
63.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Notre Dame
12131314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Notre Dame. Chris Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 548 primary output with 79.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
45.9
Efficiency
73.3
Usage
19.4
Consistency
60.7
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 35. Texas: 38. Virginia: 41. Georgia Tech: 65. Massachusetts: 34. Clemson: 83. Navy: 56. USC: 38. Temple: 72. Pittsburgh: -3. Wake Forest: 27. Boston College: 104. Stanford: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 4 by 58.3. Texas: 3 by 84.4. Virginia: 3 by 91.1. Georgia Tech: 8 by 54.2. Massachusetts: 2 by 100. Clemson: 4 by 100. Navy: 4 by 93.3. USC: 3 by 84.4. Temple: 6 by 80. Pittsburgh: 1 by 0. Wake Forest: 3 by 60. Boston College: 6 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Wins47.2 · n=10 · +5.5 vs Losses
Losses41.7 · n=3 · -5.5 vs Wins
First Half50.3 · n=7 · +9.5 vs Second Half
Second Half40.8 · n=6 · -9.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Ohio State | L 28-44 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Stanford | L 36-38 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Boston College100 receiving yards | W 19-16 | — | 6 | 104 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Wake Forest | W 28-7 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Pittsburgh | W 42-30 | — | 1 | -3 | -3 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Temple | W 24-20 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs USC | W 41-31 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Navy | W 41-24 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ Clemson | L 22-24 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Massachusetts | W 62-27 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Georgia TechHigh volume | W 30-22 | — | 8 | 65 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Virginia | W 34-27 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Texas | W 38-3 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 56 | 70 | 5.8 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Notre Dame | 209 | 76.3 | 10.3 | 153 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 209 | 76.3 | 10.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Notre Dame | 548 | 79.3 | 14.3 | 339 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 548 | 79.3 | 14.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Notre Dame | 597 | 73.3 | 19.4 | 49 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 597 | 73.3 | 19.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Primary metric
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Notre Dame
548 primary output · 79.3 efficiency · 14.3 usage
65.9
#2
2014 Regular Season · Notre Dame
65.9
548 primary · 79.3 efficiency · 14.3 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Notre Dame
63.3
597 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8823
Hanahan · Charleston, SC
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,410
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.