Usage / Role
23%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2015Notre Dame
WR • 6'1" • Hanahan, SC, USA
Chris Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
23%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
68
Solid production for a receiver
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
55
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Player Story
Chris Brown built his college career from 2012 through 2015 as a wide receiver from Hanahan, SC wearing No. 2, spending time with Notre Dame. The clearest part of Chris Brown's career was his receiving role: 104...
Read the storyChris Brown, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Notre Dame. Chris Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 2 | 2 | 56 | 0 | 38.9 |
| 2013 Postseason | Notre Dame | 7 | 5 | 54 | 0 | 51.9 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 7 | 10 | 155 | 1 | 51.9 |
| 2014 Postseason | Notre Dame | 13 | 4 | 49 | 0 | 73 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 13 | 35 | 499 | 1 | 73 |
| 2015 Postseason | Notre Dame | 13 | 4 | 35 | 1 | 74.6 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 13 | 44 | 562 | 3 | 74.6 |
Related Context
Chris Brown played WR for Notre Dame. Across 4 tracked seasons, Chris Brown recorded 5 rushing yards, 1,410 receiving yards, and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Notre Dame.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 597 primary output with 73.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
45.9
Efficiency
73.3
Usage
19.4
Consistency
60.7
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 35. Texas: 38. Virginia: 41. Georgia Tech: 65. Massachusetts: 34. Clemson: 83. Navy: 56. USC: 38. Temple: 72. Pittsburgh: -3. Wake Forest: 27. Boston College: 104. Stanford: 7
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 4 by 58.3. Texas: 3 by 84.4. Virginia: 3 by 91.1. Georgia Tech: 8 by 54.2. Massachusetts: 2 by 100. Clemson: 4 by 100. Navy: 4 by 93.3. USC: 3 by 84.4. Temple: 6 by 80. Pittsburgh: 1 by 0. Wake Forest: 3 by 60. Boston College: 6 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 46.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Ohio State | L 28-44 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Stanford | L 36-38 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Boston College100 receiving yards | W 19-16 | — | 6 | 104 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Wake Forest | W 28-7 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Pittsburgh | W 42-30 | — | 1 | -3 | -3 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Temple | W 24-20 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs USC | W 41-31 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Navy | W 41-24 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ Clemson | L 22-24 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Massachusetts | W 62-27 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Georgia TechHigh volume | W 30-22 | — | 8 | 65 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Virginia | W 34-27 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Texas | W 38-3 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 17 |
Player Story
Chris Brown built his college career from 2012 through 2015 as a wide receiver from Hanahan, SC wearing No. 2, spending time with Notre Dame. The clearest part of Chris Brown's career was his receiving role: 104 catches, 1,410 receiving yards, 6 touchdowns, and 5 rushing yards across 35 career games in the available record. His career also includes 5 rushing yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Chris Brown's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 56 | 70 | 5.8 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Notre Dame | 209 | 76.3 | 10.3 | 153 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 209 | 76.3 | 10.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Notre Dame | 548 | 79.3 | 14.3 | 339 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 548 | 79.3 | 14.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Notre Dame | 597 | 73.3 | 19.4 | 49 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 597 | 73.3 | 19.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Boston College
Week 12 · W 19-16
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Receiving Yards
98.4 takeover
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Temple
Week 1 · W 28-6
57
Receiving Yards
86.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ Clemson
Week 5 · L 22-24
83
Receiving Yards
83.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Stanford
Week 6 · W 17-14
60
Receiving Yards
80 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
@ Navy
Week 10 · W 49-39 · Conference game
82
Receiving Yards
79 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Notre Dame
597 primary output · 73.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
74.6
#2
2015 Regular Season · Notre Dame
74.6
597 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Notre Dame
73
548 primary · 79.3 efficiency · 14.3 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.