Usage Score
6.2
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTEP
Kent Taylor
TE • 6'6" • Tampa, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Kent Taylor reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
45
Consistency
54.2
Season Value
33.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Kansas
121213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Florida • Kansas • UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kent Taylor, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Kansas. Kent Taylor reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kent Taylor played TE for Florida, Kansas, and UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, Kent Taylor recorded 234 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Kansas.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Kansas paired 179 primary output with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 45 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Florida, Kansas, UTEP.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
6.3
Efficiency
45
Usage
6.2
Consistency
54.2
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: -8. Southern Miss: 0. Louisiana Tech: 7. Florida International: 10. UTSA: 19. Old Dominion: 10. Unknown: 11. North Texas: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 1 by 0. Southern Miss: 1 by 0. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 46.7. Florida International: 1 by 66.7. UTSA: 1 by 100. Old Dominion: 1 by 66.7. Unknown: 1 by 73.3. North Texas: 1 by 6.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins10 · Games = 2 · +6.2 vs Losses
Losses3.8 · Games = 5 · -6.2 vs Wins
First Half2.3 · Games = 4 · -8 vs Second Half
Second Half10.3 · Games = 4 · +8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs North Texas | W 52-24 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Old Dominion | L 21-31 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ UTSA | W 52-49 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Florida International | L 21-35 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 7-28 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Southern Miss | L 7-34 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Texas | L 7-41 | — | 1 | -8 | -8 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida
2012-2013
Opening stop
- 2
Kansas
2014-2015
Peak year stop
- 3
UTEP
2016
Final stop
Season Progression
201220122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Florida | 5 | 16.7 | 7.7 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Florida | 5 | 16.7 | 7.7 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Florida | 0 | — | — | -5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kansas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kansas | 179 | 76.9 | 8.5 | 179 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 50 | 45 | 6.2 | -129 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19
Primary metric
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rutgers
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
West Virginia
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
25
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#5
Texas
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 62.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Kansas
179 primary output · 76.9 efficiency · 8.5 usage
68.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
33.3
50 primary · 45 efficiency · 6.2 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Florida
19.3
5 primary · 16.7 efficiency · 7.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9635
Land O' Lakes · Land O Lakes, FL
- Committed To
- Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
234
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.