Player Stats

Keon Hatcher College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,866
Receptions
130
Touchdowns
20

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonArkansas1321147
2013 Regular SeasonArkansas1027346264
2014 PostseasonArkansas13441173.6
2014 Regular SeasonArkansas1339517673.6
2015 Regular SeasonArkansas213198279.5
2016 PostseasonArkansas126105179
2016 Regular SeasonArkansas1238638779

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Arkansas paired 198 primary output with 93.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 84.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Arkansas

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

61.9

Efficiency

84.4

Usage

19

Consistency

68.1

Best Game by takeover score

Virginia Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 105. Louisiana Tech: 86. TCU: 22. Texas State: 96. Texas A&M: 77. Alabama: 39. Ole Miss: 34. Auburn: 81. Florida: 6. LSU: 26. Mississippi State: 65. Missouri: 106

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 6 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 95.6. TCU: 2 by 73.3. Texas State: 3 by 100. Texas A&M: 3 by 100. Alabama: 4 by 65. Ole Miss: 3 by 75.6. Auburn: 7 by 77.1. Florida: 1 by 40. LSU: 2 by 86.7. Mississippi State: 4 by 100. Missouri: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins51.5 · Games = 6 · -20.8 vs Losses
Losses72.3 · Games = 6 · +20.8 vs Wins