Usage Score
18.5
Player Dossier
2012-2015Michigan State
WR • 5'10" • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Macgarrett Kings Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.5
Efficiency
75.5
Consistency
62.4
Season Value
64.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Macgarrett Kings Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Michigan State. Macgarrett Kings Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Michigan State paired 519 primary output with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
39.9
Efficiency
75.5
Usage
18.5
Consistency
62.4
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 27. Western Michigan: 27. Oregon: 48. Air Force: 0. Central Michigan: 46. Rutgers: 58. Michigan: 57. Indiana: 69. Nebraska: 97. Maryland: 48. Ohio State: 8. Penn State: 4. Iowa: 30
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 2 by 90. Western Michigan: 2 by 90. Oregon: 6 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 100. Rutgers: 4 by 96.7. Michigan: 3 by 100. Indiana: 7 by 65.7. Nebraska: 4 by 100. Maryland: 4 by 80. Ohio State: 1 by 53.3. Penn State: 1 by 26.7. Iowa: 4 by 50
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Alabama | L 0-38 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 12/6 | @ Iowa | W 16-13 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Penn State | W 55-16 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Ohio State | W 17-14 | — | 1 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Maryland | W 24-7 | — | 4 | 48 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Nebraska2+ TD | L 38-39 | — | 4 | 97 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Indiana | W 52-26 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Michigan | W 27-23 | — | 3 | 57 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 30 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ Rutgers | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Central Michigan | W 30-10 | — | 2 | 46 | 16.3 | 23 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Air Force | W 35-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Oregon | W 31-28 | — | 6 | 48 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Fri 9/4 | @ Western Michigan | W 37-24 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 20 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 25 | 35.5 | 5.7 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan State | 513 | 77.7 | 16.9 | 488 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 513 | 77.7 | 16.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Michigan State | 404 | 69 | 13.2 | -109 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 404 | 69 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 519 | 75.5 | 18.5 | 115 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 519 | 75.5 | 18.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94
Primary metric
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Maryland
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
61
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Michigan State
519 primary output · 75.5 efficiency · 18.5 usage
64.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · Michigan State
64.1
519 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 18.5 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Michigan State
61.8
513 primary · 77.7 efficiency · 16.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8483
Creekside · Fairburn, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,461
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Macgarrett Kings Jr. quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit