Usage Score
34.9
Player Dossier
2012-2015Michigan State
WR • 6'1" • Farmington Hills, MI, USA
Aaron Burbridge reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
34.9
Efficiency
83.6
Consistency
66
Season Value
71
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aaron Burbridge, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Michigan State. Aaron Burbridge reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Michigan State paired 1,258 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
89.9
Efficiency
83.6
Usage
34.9
Consistency
66
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 39. Western Michigan: 117. Oregon: 101. Air Force: 156. Central Michigan: 31. Purdue: 9. Rutgers: 156. Michigan: 132. Indiana: 128. Nebraska: 164. Maryland: 27. Ohio State: 62. Penn State: 75. Iowa: 61
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 5 by 52. Western Michigan: 4 by 100. Oregon: 8 by 84.2. Air Force: 8 by 100. Central Michigan: 4 by 51.7. Purdue: 1 by 60. Rutgers: 10 by 100. Michigan: 9 by 97.8. Indiana: 8 by 100. Nebraska: 10 by 100. Maryland: 3 by 60. Ohio State: 4 by 100. Penn State: 6 by 83.3. Iowa: 5 by 81.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Alabama | L 0-38 | — | 5 | 39 | 5.9 | 7.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 12/6 | @ Iowa | W 16-13 | — | 5 | 61 | 11 | 12.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Penn State | W 55-16 | — | 6 | 75 | 10.1 | 12.50 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Ohio State | W 17-14 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Maryland | W 24-7 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Nebraska100 receiving yards · High volume | L 38-39 | — | 10 | 164 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Indiana100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-26 | — | 8 | 128 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-23 | — | 9 | 132 | 14.1 | 14.70 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ Rutgers100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-24 | — | 10 | 156 | 14.7 | 15.60 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Purdue | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Central Michigan | W 30-10 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-21 | — | 8 | 156 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 3 | 32 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Oregon100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-28 | — | 8 | 101 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 28 |
| Fri 9/4 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards | W 37-24 | — | 4 | 117 | 29.3 | 29.30 | 0 | 56 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Michigan State | 364 | 68.2 | 24 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 364 | 68.2 | 24 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 194 | 65.9 | 14.2 | -170 |
| 2014 Postseason | Michigan State | 358 | 81.8 | 13.4 | 164 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 358 | 81.8 | 13.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 1,258 | 83.6 | 34.9 | 900 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 1,258 | 83.6 | 34.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
156
Primary metric
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
164
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
156
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Indiana
134
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Michigan State
1,258 primary output · 83.6 efficiency · 34.9 usage
71
#2
2015 Regular Season · Michigan State
71
1,258 primary · 83.6 efficiency · 34.9 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Michigan State
47.3
358 primary · 81.8 efficiency · 13.4 usage
8
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.959
Harrison · Farmington, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,174
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Aaron Burbridge quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit