Usage Score
8.6
Player Dossier
2012-2015Indiana
QB • 6'6" • Modesto, CA, USA
Nate Sudfeld is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
8.6
Efficiency
62.1
Consistency
75.1
Season Value
61.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Indiana
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nate Sudfeld, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Indiana. Nate Sudfeld is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Nate Sudfeld played QB for Indiana. Across 4 tracked seasons, Nate Sudfeld recorded 7,879 passing yards, 132 rushing yards, and 69 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Indiana.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Indiana paired 3,634 primary output with 62.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 62.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 395 yards of offense and 85.6 efficiency. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
302.8
Efficiency
62.1
Usage
8.6
Consistency
75.1
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 409. Unknown: 395. Florida International: 217. Western Kentucky: 363. Wake Forest: 206. Ohio State: 137. Rutgers: 456. Michigan State: 292. Iowa: 184. Michigan: 228. Maryland: 384. Purdue: 363
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 54 by 67.4. Unknown: 37 by 85.6. Florida International: 40 by 51.1. Western Kentucky: 30 by 75.2. Wake Forest: 40 by 51.9. Ohio State: 23 by 53.9. Rutgers: 44 by 62.3. Michigan State: 39 by 55.2. Iowa: 41 by 45.7. Michigan: 40 by 56.5. Maryland: 38 by 64.3. Purdue: 32 by 76.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
85.6 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/26 | @ Duke300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 41-44 | 28 | 51 | 389 | 54.9 | 3 | 2 | 67.4 | 3 | 20 | 6.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Purdue300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 54-36 | 18 | 29 | 350 | 62.1 | 4 | 0 | 76.4 | 3 | 13 | 4.30 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Maryland300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 47-28 | 23 | 35 | 385 | 65.7 | 4 | 0 | 64.3 | 3 | -1 | -0.30 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Michigan | L 41-48 | 20 | 34 | 220 | 58.8 | 1 | 0 | 56.5 | 6 | 8 | 1.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Iowa | L 27-35 | 16 | 37 | 180 | 43.2 | 1 | 1 | 45.7 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Michigan State300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 26-52 | 23 | 37 | 308 | 62.2 | 3 | 1 | 55.2 | 2 | -16 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Rutgers300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 52-55 | 32 | 42 | 464 | 76.2 | 4 | 2 | 62.3 | 2 | -8 | -4 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Ohio State | L 27-34 | 10 | 21 | 134 | 47.6 | 0 | 0 | 53.9 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Wake Forest | W 31-24 | 19 | 34 | 205 | 55.9 | 2 | 0 | 51.9 | 6 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Western Kentucky300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 38-35 | 20 | 27 | 355 | 74.1 | 3 | 0 | 75.2 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Florida International3+ TD | W 36-22 | 19 | 33 | 234 | 57.6 | 1 | 1 | 51.1 | 7 | -17 | -2.40 | 2 | 5 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown300-yard game | — | 19 | 32 | 349 | 59.4 | 1 | 0 | 85.6 | 5 | 46 | 9.20 | 0 | 21 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Indiana
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Indiana | 639 | 54.3 | 6.9 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Indiana | 2,489 | 61.1 | 11.4 | 1,850 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Indiana | 1,249 | 59.3 | 12.4 | -1,240 |
| 2015 Postseason | Indiana | 3,634 | 62.1 | 8.6 | 2,385 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Indiana | 3,634 | 62.1 | 8.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 219 yards of offense and 82.4 efficiency.
219
Primary metric
219 total offense with 82.4 efficiency.
#2
Navy
398
Primary metric
Loss with 398 yards of offense and 73.7 efficiency.
398 total offense with 73.7 efficiency.
#3
Bowling Green
374
Primary metric
Loss with 374 yards of offense and 71.2 efficiency.
374 total offense with 71.2 efficiency.
#4
Unknown
395
Primary metric
Game with 395 yards of offense and 85.6 efficiency.
395 total offense with 85.6 efficiency.
#5
Rutgers
456
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
456 total offense with 62.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Indiana
3,634 primary output · 62.1 efficiency · 8.6 usage
61.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · Indiana
61.5
3,634 primary · 62.1 efficiency · 8.6 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Indiana
55.3
2,489 primary · 61.1 efficiency · 11.4 usage
13
250+ passing yards
10
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
17
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8786
Modesto Christian · Modesto, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
8,011
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.