Usage Score
5.5
Player Dossier
2012-2016Alabama
Dalvin Tomlinson
DL • 6'3" • McDonaugh, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Dalvin Tomlinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
25.6
Consistency
35.6
Season Value
22.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Alabama
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dalvin Tomlinson, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Alabama. Dalvin Tomlinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Alabama paired 12.5 primary output with 25.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Alabama
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
25.6
Usage
5.5
Consistency
35.6
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112131415
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 1. Washington: 0. USC: 0. Western Kentucky: 2. Ole Miss: 1. Kent State: 0. Kentucky: 1. Arkansas: 0. Tennessee: 0. Texas A&M: 3.5. LSU: 2.5. Mississippi State: 0. Unknown: 0.5. Auburn: 1. Florida: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 4 by 26.7. Washington: 4 by 16.7. USC: 1 by 4.2. Western Kentucky: 3 by 32.5. Ole Miss: 7 by 39.2. Kent State: 1 by 4.2. Kentucky: 2 by 18.3. Arkansas: 3 by 12.5. Tennessee: 5 by 20.8. Texas A&M: 3 by 47.5. LSU: 6 by 50. Mississippi State: 6 by 25. Unknown: 8 by 38.3. Auburn: 4 by 26.7. Florida: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=13
First Half0.6 · n=8 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1.1 · n=7 · +0.4 vs First Half
All Games0.8 · n=15
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
50 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | vs Clemson | L 31-35 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/31 | vs Washington | W 24-7 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Florida | W 54-16 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Auburn | W 30-12 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Mississippi State | W 51-3 | 6 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | @ LSU | W 10-0 | 6 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Texas A&M | W 33-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Tennessee | W 49-10 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Arkansas | W 49-30 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Kentucky | W 34-6 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Kent State | W 48-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Ole Miss | W 48-43 | 7 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Western Kentucky | W 38-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | vs USC | W 52-6 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Alabama | 12.5 | 25.6 | 5.5 | 12.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Alabama | 12.5 | 25.6 | 5.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.6 takeover score.
#2
LSU
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#3
Western Kentucky
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 34.5 takeover score.
#4
Ole Miss
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.1 takeover score.
#5
Clemson
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 20.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Alabama
12.5 primary output · 25.6 efficiency · 5.5 usage
22.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Alabama
22.4
12.5 primary · 25.6 efficiency · 5.5 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Alabama
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9195
Henry County · McDonough, GA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
62
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.