Usage Score
44.4
Player Dossier
2012-2015Army
TE • 6'3" • Enola, PA, USA
Kelvin White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
44.4
Efficiency
57.8
Consistency
20.3
Season Value
35.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kelvin White, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Army. Kelvin White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kelvin White played TE for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kelvin White recorded 186 passing yards, 146 rushing yards, and 120 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Army paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
9.6
Efficiency
57.8
Usage
44.4
Consistency
20.3
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. UConn: 9. Duke: 37. Rice: 2. Navy: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 1 by 60. Duke: 1 by 100. Rice: 1 by 13.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | 0.2 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 72 | 56.7 | 32.4 | 72 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 48 | 57.8 | 44.4 | -24 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
43
Primary metric
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Duke
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UConn
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#5
Kent State
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Army
0 primary output · — efficiency · 0.2 usage
50.1
#2
2014 Regular Season · Army
37.1
72 primary · 56.7 efficiency · 32.4 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Army
35.7
48 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 44.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7433
East Pennsboro · Enola, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
120
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.