Usage Score
21.2
Player Dossier
2012-2015Kansas
Tre' Parmalee
WR • 5'10" • Overland Park, KS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tre' Parmalee reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.2
Consistency
72.8
Season Value
67.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Kansas
12131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Kansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tre' Parmalee, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Kansas. Tre' Parmalee reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tre' Parmalee played WR for Kansas. Across 4 tracked seasons, Tre' Parmalee recorded 37 rushing yards, 773 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Kansas.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Kansas paired 599 primary output with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · Kansas
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
59.9
Efficiency
80.2
Usage
21.2
Consistency
72.8
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 82. Memphis: 15. Rutgers: 64. Iowa State: 81. Texas Tech: 84. Oklahoma State: 115. Oklahoma: 23. TCU: 21. West Virginia: 64. Kansas State: 50
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 100. Memphis: 2 by 50. Rutgers: 5 by 85.3. Iowa State: 5 by 100. Texas Tech: 5 by 100. Oklahoma State: 6 by 100. Oklahoma: 3 by 51.1. TCU: 3 by 46.7. West Virginia: 5 by 85.3. Kansas State: 4 by 83.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses57.4 · Games = 9
First Half65.2 · Games = 5 · +10.6 vs Second Half
Second Half54.6 · Games = 5 · -10.6 vs First Half
All Games59.9 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Kansas State | L 14-45 | — | 4 | 50 | 10.4 | 12.50 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs West Virginia | L 0-49 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ TCU | L 17-23 | — | 3 | 21 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Oklahoma | L 7-62 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Oklahoma State100 receiving yards | L 10-58 | — | 6 | 115 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Texas Tech | L 20-30 | — | 5 | 84 | 13.7 | 16.80 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Iowa State | L 13-38 | — | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Rutgers | L 14-27 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Memphis | L 23-55 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 82 | 25.3 | 27.30 | 0 | 35 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kansas
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Kansas | 79 | 67.3 | 10.4 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Kansas | 74 | 47.2 | 12.2 | -5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kansas | 21 | 36.7 | 5 | -53 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kansas | 599 | 80.2 | 21.2 | 578 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa State
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas Tech
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Kansas
599 primary output · 80.2 efficiency · 21.2 usage
67.5
#2
2012 Regular Season · Kansas
31.3
79 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 10.4 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Kansas
28.4
21 primary · 36.7 efficiency · 5 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.815
Bishop Miege · Mission, KS
- Committed To
- Kansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
773
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.