Player Stats

Devin Chafin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,299
Rushing yards
1,256
Receiving yards
43
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonBaylor00000-
2013 Regular SeasonBaylor82952950446.7
2014 PostseasonBaylor9-2-20047.5
2014 Regular SeasonBaylor941938534847.5
2015 PostseasonBaylor101561560160.6
2015 Regular SeasonBaylor104314229960.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Baylor paired 587 primary output with 45.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 45.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Baylor

Games

10

Scrimmage Yards / G

58.7

Efficiency

45.1

Usage

16.9

Consistency

48.9

Best Game by takeover score

North Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 156. SMU: 76. Lamar: 35. West Virginia: 1. Iowa State: 10. Kansas State: 39. Oklahoma: 49. Oklahoma State: 60. TCU: 123. Texas: 38

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 27 by 60.2. SMU: 13 by 61.3. Lamar: 7 by 52.1. West Virginia: 1 by 10.4. Iowa State: 3 by 34.7. Kansas State: 10 by 40.6. Oklahoma: 13 by 39.3. Oklahoma State: 16 by 39.1. TCU: 27 by 47.6. Texas: 6 by 66

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins53.9 · Games = 7 · -16.1 vs Losses
Losses70 · Games = 3 · +16.1 vs Wins