Player Stats

Reginald Davis III College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,301
Receptions
97
Touchdowns
19

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 PostseasonTexas Tech11138147.5
2013 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1114162347.5
2014 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1029318553.9
2015 PostseasonTexas Tech13237168.3
2015 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1336499768.3
2016 Regular SeasonTexas Tech915247246.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Texas Tech paired 536 primary output with 77.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 84.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Stephen F. Austin

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · Texas Tech

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

27.4

Efficiency

84.6

Usage

6.2

Consistency

34.2

Best Game by takeover score

Stephen F. Austin

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Stephen F. Austin: 80. Arizona State: 16. Louisiana Tech: 9. Kansas State: 34. West Virginia: 0. Oklahoma: 68. TCU: 40. Texas: 0. Oklahoma State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stephen F. Austin: 2 by 100. Arizona State: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 60. Kansas State: 4 by 56.7. Oklahoma: 5 by 90.7. TCU: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins43 · Games = 3 · +23.3 vs Losses
Losses19.7 · Games = 6 · -23.3 vs Wins