Usage Score
16.3
Player Dossier
2012-2016South Carolina
Darius English
DL • 6'6" • Powder Springs, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Darius English shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
36.1
Consistency
58.1
Season Value
37.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- South Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darius English, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina. Darius English shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
South Carolina paired 23 primary output with 36.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 36.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · South Carolina
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
36.1
Usage
16.3
Consistency
58.1
Best Game by takeover score
South Florida
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Florida: 0.5. Vanderbilt: 1. Mississippi State: 0. East Carolina: 1. Kentucky: 6. Texas A&M: 2. Georgia: 2. Massachusetts: 2. Tennessee: 1. Missouri: 2. Florida: 2.5. Unknown: 2. Clemson: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Florida: 3 by 17.5. Vanderbilt: 4 by 26.7. Mississippi State: 5 by 20.8. East Carolina: 2 by 18.3. Kentucky: 8 by 83.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 32.5. Georgia: 6 by 45. Massachusetts: 2 by 28.3. Tennessee: 5 by 30.8. Missouri: 2 by 28.3. Florida: 10 by 66.7. Unknown: 5 by 40.8. Clemson: 5 by 30.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=5 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses2 · n=7 · +0.6 vs Wins
First Half1.8 · n=7 · +0.0 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · n=6 · -0.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | vs South Florida | L 39-46 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | @ Clemson | L 7-56 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Florida10+ tackles · Splash game | L 7-20 | 10 | 2 | — | 2 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Missouri | W 31-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Tennessee | W 24-21 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Massachusetts | W 34-28 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Georgia | L 14-28 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Texas A&M | L 13-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Kentucky2+ sacks · Splash game | L 10-17 | 8 | 7 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs East Carolina | W 20-15 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Mississippi State | L 14-27 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Vanderbilt | W 13-10 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
South Carolina
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | South Carolina | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | South Carolina | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | South Carolina | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | South Carolina | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | South Carolina | 23 | 36.1 | 16.3 | 23 |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Carolina | 23 | 36.1 | 16.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 72.8 takeover score.
#2
Florida
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 44.2 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 37.1 takeover score.
#4
Georgia
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 33.3 takeover score.
#5
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 28.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · South Carolina
23 primary output · 36.1 efficiency · 16.3 usage
37.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · South Carolina
37.6
23 primary · 36.1 efficiency · 16.3 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · South Carolina
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9023
McEachern · Powder Springs, GA
- Committed To
- South Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
60
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.