Player Stats

Michael Rector College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,681
Receptions
104
Touchdowns
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonStanford0-00-
2013 PostseasonStanford8244070.9
2013 Regular SeasonStanford812387370.9
2014 PostseasonStanford11115056.7
2014 Regular SeasonStanford1123309256.7
2015 PostseasonStanford13273271.8
2015 Regular SeasonStanford1332486571.8
2016 PostseasonStanford12112059.7
2016 Regular SeasonStanford1231355459.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Stanford paired 559 primary output with 75.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 63.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Washington State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Stanford

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

30.6

Efficiency

63.1

Usage

18.8

Consistency

47.4

Best Game by takeover score

Washington State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 12. Kansas State: 73. USC: 3. UCLA: 3. Washington: 18. Washington State: 90. Notre Dame: 34. Colorado: 36. Arizona: 13. Oregon State: 10. Oregon: 45. Rice: 30

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 1 by 80. Kansas State: 4 by 100. USC: 1 by 20. UCLA: 1 by 20. Washington: 3 by 40. Washington State: 5 by 100. Notre Dame: 3 by 75.6. Colorado: 4 by 60. Arizona: 1 by 86.7. Oregon State: 2 by 33.3. Oregon: 4 by 75. Rice: 3 by 66.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins24.8 · Games = 9 · -23.2 vs Losses
Losses48 · Games = 3 · +23.2 vs Wins