Player Stats

Chris Brown College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
425
Rushing yards
376
Receiving yards
49
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonOregon State00000-
2013 PostseasonOregon State6000057.7
2013 Regular SeasonOregon State61501446157.7
2014 Regular SeasonOregon State71289137252.8
2015 Regular SeasonOregon State51471416158.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Oregon State paired 147 primary output with 42.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 42.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Weber State

Win with 60 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Oregon State

Games

5

Scrimmage Yards / G

29.4

Efficiency

42.8

Usage

10.7

Consistency

62.9

Best Game by takeover score

Weber State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Weber State: 60. Michigan: 33. San José State: 7. Washington State: 5. Colorado: 42

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Weber State: 15 by 40.8. Michigan: 8 by 46.7. San José State: 3 by 24.3. Washington State: 3 by 17.4. Colorado: 5 by 85

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins33.5 · Games = 2 · +6.8 vs Losses
Losses26.7 · Games = 3 · -6.8 vs Wins