Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Oregon State paired 147 primary output with 42.8 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Oregon State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Postseason | Oregon State | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57.7 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Oregon State | 6 | 150 | 144 | 6 | 1 | 57.7 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Oregon State | 7 | 128 | 91 | 37 | 2 | 52.8 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oregon State | 5 | 147 | 141 | 6 | 1 | 58.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Oregon State paired 147 primary output with 42.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 42.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Weber State
Win with 60 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Scrimmage Yards / G
29.4
Efficiency
42.8
Usage
10.7
Consistency
62.9
Best Game by takeover score
Weber State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Weber State: 60. Michigan: 33. San José State: 7. Washington State: 5. Colorado: 42
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Weber State: 15 by 40.8. Michigan: 8 by 46.7. San José State: 3 by 24.3. Washington State: 3 by 17.4. Colorado: 5 by 85
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.