Usage Score
17.8
Player Dossier
2012-2016Michigan
Jehu Chesson
WR • 6'3" • St. Louis, MO, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jehu Chesson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.3
Consistency
52.6
Season Value
53.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Michigan
1213131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jehu Chesson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Michigan. Jehu Chesson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Michigan paired 764 primary output with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Michigan
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
38.5
Efficiency
82.3
Usage
17.8
Consistency
52.6
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 31. Hawai'i: 43. UCF: 84. Colorado: 0. Penn State: 18. Wisconsin: 52. Rutgers: 34. Illinois: 44. Michigan State: 29. Maryland: 112. Iowa: 30. Indiana: 12. Ohio State: 11
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 4 by 51.7. Hawai'i: 3 by 95.6. UCF: 4 by 100. Penn State: 1 by 100. Wisconsin: 5 by 69.3. Rutgers: 2 by 100. Illinois: 3 by 97.8. Michigan State: 2 by 96.7. Maryland: 5 by 100. Iowa: 2 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 40. Ohio State: 2 by 36.7
Split Comparison
Wins42.8 · n=10 · +18.8 vs Losses
Losses24 · n=3 · -18.8 vs Wins
First Half37.4 · n=7 · -2.2 vs Second Half
Second Half39.7 · n=6 · +2.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Maryland
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Florida State | L 32-33 | — | 4 | 31 | 6.6 | 7.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Ohio State | L 27-30 | — | 2 | 11 | 6.3 | 5.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Indiana | W 20-10 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Iowa | L 13-14 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Maryland100 receiving yards | W 59-3 | — | 5 | 112 | 22.4 | 22.40 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Michigan State | W 32-23 | — | 2 | 29 | 9 | 14.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Illinois | W 41-8 | — | 3 | 44 | 12.3 | 14.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Rutgers | W 78-0 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Wisconsin | W 14-7 | — | 5 | 52 | 8.6 | 10.40 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Penn State | W 49-10 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Colorado | W 45-28 | — | — | — | 8.3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UCF | W 51-14 | — | 4 | 84 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Hawai'i | W 63-3 | — | 3 | 43 | 10.8 | 14.30 | 0 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan | 221 | 73 | 10.6 | 221 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 221 | 73 | 10.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 154 | 68.1 | 14.2 | -67 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan | 764 | 82.8 | 18.5 | 610 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 764 | 82.8 | 18.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Michigan | 500 | 82.3 | 17.8 | -264 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 500 | 82.3 | 17.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
207
Primary metric
207 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Maryland
112
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan State
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Michigan
764 primary output · 82.8 efficiency · 18.5 usage
57.8
#2
2015 Regular Season · Michigan
57.8
764 primary · 82.8 efficiency · 18.5 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Michigan
53.5
500 primary · 82.3 efficiency · 17.8 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8681
Ladue Horton Watkins · St. Louis, MO
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,639
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.