Usage Score
9.5
Player Dossier
2012-2015Michigan
TE • 6'6" • Cincinnati, OH, USA
A.J. Williams reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.5
Efficiency
62.4
Consistency
60.3
Season Value
57.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Williams, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Michigan. A.J. Williams reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Michigan paired 129 primary output with 62.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 62.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
18.4
Efficiency
62.4
Usage
9.5
Consistency
60.3
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 2. Oregon State: 22. BYU: 7. Northwestern: 48. Michigan State: 20. Rutgers: 21. Penn State: 9
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 1 by 13.3. Oregon State: 1 by 100. BYU: 1 by 46.7. Northwestern: 4 by 80. Michigan State: 2 by 66.7. Rutgers: 1 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 30
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rutgers
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 2 | 13.3 | 7.7 | 2 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 33 | 60 | 7.8 | 31 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 129 | 62.4 | 9.5 | 96 |
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48
Primary metric
48 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#2
Maryland
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon State
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
21
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Michigan
129 primary output · 62.4 efficiency · 9.5 usage
57.9
#2
2014 Regular Season · Michigan
47.2
33 primary · 60 efficiency · 7.8 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Michigan
30.6
2 primary · 13.3 efficiency · 7.7 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8965
Sycamore · Cincinnati, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
164
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
A.J. Williams quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit