Usage Score
24.1
Player Dossier
2012-2016Michigan
Amara Darboh
WR • 6'2" • West Des Moines, IA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Amara Darboh reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.8
Consistency
63.1
Season Value
67
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Michigan
12131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amara Darboh, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Michigan. Amara Darboh reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Michigan paired 862 primary output with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Michigan
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
66.3
Efficiency
80.8
Usage
24.1
Consistency
63.1
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 36. Hawai'i: 42. UCF: 111. Colorado: 51. Penn State: 44. Wisconsin: 87. Rutgers: 65. Illinois: 99. Michigan State: 165. Maryland: 77. Iowa: 5. Indiana: 12. Ohio State: 68
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 5 by 48. Hawai'i: 3 by 93.3. UCF: 5 by 100. Colorado: 2 by 100. Penn State: 7 by 41.9. Wisconsin: 6 by 96.7. Rutgers: 2 by 100. Illinois: 5 by 100. Michigan State: 8 by 100. Maryland: 4 by 100. Iowa: 1 by 33.3. Indiana: 1 by 80. Ohio State: 8 by 56.7
Split Comparison
Wins75.3 · n=10 · +39.0 vs Losses
Losses36.3 · n=3 · -39.0 vs Wins
First Half62.3 · n=7 · -8.7 vs Second Half
Second Half71 · n=6 · +8.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Florida State | L 32-33 | — | 5 | 36 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Ohio StateHigh volume | L 27-30 | — | 8 | 68 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Indiana | W 20-10 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Iowa | L 13-14 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Maryland | W 59-3 | — | 4 | 77 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Michigan State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 32-23 | — | 8 | 165 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Illinois | W 41-8 | — | 5 | 99 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Rutgers | W 78-0 | — | 2 | 65 | 32.5 | 32.50 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Wisconsin | W 14-7 | — | 6 | 87 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Penn State | W 49-10 | — | 7 | 44 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Colorado | W 45-28 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UCF100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 51-14 | — | 5 | 111 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 2 | 45 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Hawai'i | W 63-3 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 473 | 78.2 | 20.4 | 473 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan | 727 | 79.4 | 22.5 | 254 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 727 | 79.4 | 22.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Michigan | 862 | 80.8 | 24.1 | 135 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan | 862 | 80.8 | 24.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
165
Primary metric
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 79.3 efficiency score.
#4
Indiana
109
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 90.8 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
101
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 84.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Michigan
862 primary output · 80.8 efficiency · 24.1 usage
67
#2
2016 Regular Season · Michigan
67
862 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 24.1 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Michigan
65.2
727 primary · 79.4 efficiency · 22.5 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9188
Dowling Catholic · West Des Moines, IA
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,062
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.