Usage / Role
34%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2015Michigan
FB • 6'0" • Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Sione Houma leans balanced backfield option traits and 47.6 efficiency.
Usage / Role
34%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
51
Solid production for a back
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
44
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Michigan
Snapshot
Player Story
Sione Houma built his college career from 2012 through 2015 as a FB from Salt Lake City, UT wearing No. 39, spending time with Michigan. The clearest part of Sione Houma's career was his backfield work: 184 rushing...
Read the storySione Houma, FB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Michigan. Sione Houma leans balanced backfield option traits and 47.6 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 32.7 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 32.7 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan | 12 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 1 | 56.6 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 12 | 229 | 152 | 77 | 4 | 56.6 |
Related Context
Sione Houma played FB for Michigan. Across 4 tracked seasons, Sione Houma recorded 184 rushing yards, 91 receiving yards, and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Michigan paired 261 primary output with 47.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 47.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with 51 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
21.8
Efficiency
47.6
Usage
7.4
Consistency
57.9
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 32. Oregon State: 20. UNLV: 8. BYU: 17. Maryland: 26. Northwestern: 13. Michigan State: 30. Minnesota: 2. Rutgers: 51. Indiana: 37. Penn State: 13. Ohio State: 12
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 9 by 37. Oregon State: 2 by 91.7. UNLV: 3 by 20.5. BYU: 4 by 44.3. Maryland: 4 by 64.6. Northwestern: 3 by 45.1. Michigan State: 3 by 91.7. Minnesota: 1 by 16.7. Rutgers: 7 by 50.1. Indiana: 7 by 43.3. Penn State: 5 by 24.9. Ohio State: 3 by 41.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Florida | W 41-7 | 9 | 32 | 3.60 | 1 | — | — | 3.6 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Ohio State | L 13-42 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Penn State | W 28-16 | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2.6 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Indiana | W 48-41 | 5 | 17 | 3.40 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 5.3 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Rutgers | W 49-16 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | 32 | 7.3 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Minnesota | W 29-26 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Michigan State2+ TD | L 23-27 | 3 | 30 | 10 | 2 | — | — | 10 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Northwestern | W 38-0 | 3 | 13 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Maryland | W 28-0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 6.5 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs BYU | W 31-0 | 4 | 17 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs UNLV | W 28-7 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2.7 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Oregon State | W 35-7 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 0 | — | — | 10 |
Player Story
Sione Houma built his college career from 2012 through 2015 as a FB from Salt Lake City, UT wearing No. 39, spending time with Michigan. The clearest part of Sione Houma's career was his backfield work: 184 rushing yards, 43 carries, 5 rushing touchdowns, and 91 receiving yards across 16 career games in the available record. His career also includes 91 receiving yards and 28 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Sione Houma's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan | 14 | 58.4 | 1.6 | 14 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 14 | 58.4 | 1.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | -14 |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan | 261 | 47.6 | 7.4 | 261 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 261 | 47.6 | 7.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Rutgers
Week 10 · W 49-16 · Conference game
Win with 51 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
51
Scrimmage Yards
61.4 takeover
51 scrimmage yards and 11.9 usage.
#2
vs Akron
Week 3 · W 28-24
9
Scrimmage Yards
60.3 takeover
Win with 9 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
9 scrimmage yards and 2.1 usage.
#3
vs Michigan State
Week 7 · L 23-27 · Conference game
30
Scrimmage Yards
56.2 takeover
Loss with 30 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
30 scrimmage yards and 6.3 usage.
#4
@ Indiana
Week 11 · W 48-41 · Conference game
37
Scrimmage Yards
49.6 takeover
Win with 37 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
37 scrimmage yards and 11.5 usage.
#5
@ Florida
Week 1 · W 41-7 · Postseason
32
Scrimmage Yards
46.7 takeover
Win with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
32 scrimmage yards and 14.1 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Michigan
261 primary output · 47.6 efficiency · 7.4 usage
56.6
#2
2015 Regular Season · Michigan
56.6
261 primary · 47.6 efficiency · 7.4 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Michigan
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.