Usage Score
13.1
Player Dossier
2012-2014Michigan
Dennis Norfleet
WR • 5'7" • Detroit, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Dennis Norfleet reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
52.7
Consistency
41.6
Season Value
42.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Michigan
1212131314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dennis Norfleet, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Michigan. Dennis Norfleet reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Dennis Norfleet played WR for Michigan. Across 3 tracked seasons, Dennis Norfleet recorded 130 rushing yards and 157 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Michigan.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 52.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Michigan
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
10.1
Efficiency
52.7
Usage
13.1
Consistency
41.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 30. Notre Dame: 16. Miami (OH): 0. Utah: 8. Minnesota: 0. Rutgers: 24. Penn State: 24. Michigan State: 0. Indiana: 0. Maryland: 0. Ohio State: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 3 by 66.7. Notre Dame: 3 by 35.6. Utah: 2 by 26.7. Rutgers: 2 by 80. Penn State: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 0. Ohio State: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins13.5 · Games = 4 · +5.4 vs Losses
Losses8.1 · Games = 7 · -5.4 vs Wins
First Half13 · Games = 6 · +6.4 vs Second Half
Second Half6.6 · Games = 5 · -6.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Ohio State | L 28-42 | — | 1 | 9 | 4.8 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Maryland | L 16-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Indiana | W 34-10 | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Michigan State | L 11-35 | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Penn State | W 18-13 | — | 1 | 24 | 13.5 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Rutgers | L 24-26 | — | 2 | 24 | 10.7 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Minnesota | L 14-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Utah | L 10-26 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Miami (OH) | W 34-10 | — | — | — | 21 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Notre Dame | L 0-31 | — | 3 | 16 | 7.2 | 5.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs App State | W 52-14 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122012201320132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan | 46 | 47.5 | 9 | 46 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 46 | 47.5 | 9 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 111 | 52.7 | 13.1 | 65 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24
Primary metric
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
App State
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 50 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Michigan
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2012 Regular Season · Michigan
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Michigan
42.6
111 primary · 52.7 efficiency · 13.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9241
Martin Luther King · Detroit, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
157
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.