Usage Score
35.3
Player Dossier
2012-2014Michigan
WR • 6'5" • Farmington Hills, MI, USA
Devin Funchess reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
35.3
Efficiency
76.2
Consistency
73.6
Season Value
70.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devin Funchess, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Michigan. Devin Funchess reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Devin Funchess played WR for Michigan. Across 3 tracked seasons, Devin Funchess recorded 23 rushing yards, 1,715 receiving yards, and 15 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Michigan paired 733 primary output with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
66.6
Efficiency
76.2
Usage
35.3
Consistency
73.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 95. Notre Dame: 107. Utah: 82. Minnesota: 37. Rutgers: 71. Penn State: 69. Michigan State: 64. Indiana: 47. Northwestern: 23. Maryland: 30. Ohio State: 108
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 7 by 90.5. Notre Dame: 9 by 79.3. Utah: 4 by 100. Minnesota: 4 by 61.7. Rutgers: 5 by 94.7. Penn State: 7 by 65.7. Michigan State: 5 by 85.3. Indiana: 7 by 44.8. Northwestern: 2 by 76.7. Maryland: 5 by 40. Ohio State: 7 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Ohio State100 receiving yards | L 28-42 | — | 7 | 108 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Maryland | L 16-23 | — | 5 | 30 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Northwestern | W 10-9 | — | 2 | 23 | 5.7 | 11.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Indiana | W 34-10 | — | 7 | 47 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Michigan State | L 11-35 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Penn State | W 18-13 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Rutgers | L 24-26 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Minnesota | L 14-30 | — | 4 | 37 | 6.4 | 9.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Utah | L 10-26 | — | 4 | 82 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards · High volume | L 0-31 | — | 9 | 107 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs App State2+ TD | W 52-14 | — | 7 | 95 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 3 | 34 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Michigan | 234 | 69.7 | 11.3 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 234 | 69.7 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan | 748 | 76.2 | 21.6 | 514 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 748 | 76.2 | 21.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 733 | 76.2 | 35.3 | -15 |
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
151
Primary metric
151 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
108
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Air Force
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Notre Dame
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 79.3 efficiency score.
#5
App State
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 90.5 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Michigan
733 primary output · 76.2 efficiency · 35.3 usage
70.6
#2
2013 Postseason · Michigan
65.3
748 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 21.6 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Michigan
65.3
748 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 21.6 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9095
Harrison · Farmington, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,715
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.