Player Stats

Spencer McInnis College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
700
Rushing yards
503
Receiving yards
197
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)00000-
2013 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)8572928019.3
2014 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)934524699061.7
2015 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)81348549035.9
2016 PostseasonMiami (OH)10000041.4
2016 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)1016414321141.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season

Miami (OH) paired 345 primary output with 41.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 34.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo

Win with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Miami (OH)

Games

10

Scrimmage Yards / G

16.4

Efficiency

34.8

Usage

9.1

Consistency

57.4

Best Game by takeover score

Buffalo

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Ohio: 22. Akron: 14. Kent State: 12. Bowling Green: 26. Eastern Michigan: 32. Central Michigan: 16. Buffalo: 40. Ball State: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 7 by 32.7. Akron: 6 by 24.3. Kent State: 2 by 62.5. Bowling Green: 6 by 34.3. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 52.2. Central Michigan: 7 by 23.8. Buffalo: 11 by 37.9. Ball State: 2 by 10.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins21.3 · Games = 6 · +12.3 vs Losses
Losses9 · Games = 4 · -12.3 vs Wins