Player Stats

Gabe Marks College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
3,453
Receptions
316
Touchdowns
37

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonWashington State1249560250.2
2013 PostseasonWashington State12537164
2013 Regular SeasonWashington State1269770664
2014 Regular SeasonWashington State0-00-
2015 PostseasonWashington State13567181.6
2015 Regular SeasonWashington State13991,1251481.6
2016 PostseasonWashington State13427069.2
2016 Regular SeasonWashington State13858671369.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Washington State paired 1,192 primary output with 78.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 65.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Washington State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

68.8

Efficiency

65.8

Usage

19.4

Consistency

71.1

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 27. Eastern Washington: 108. Boise State: 75. Idaho: 59. Oregon: 20. Stanford: 39. UCLA: 36. Arizona State: 107. Oregon State: 110. Arizona: 68. California: 87. Colorado: 46. Washington: 112

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 4 by 45. Eastern Washington: 10 by 72. Boise State: 10 by 50. Idaho: 7 by 56.2. Oregon: 2 by 66.7. Stanford: 5 by 52. UCLA: 6 by 40. Arizona State: 8 by 89.2. Oregon State: 8 by 91.7. Arizona: 5 by 90.7. California: 7 by 82.9. Colorado: 6 by 51.1. Washington: 11 by 67.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins65.8 · Games = 8 · -7.8 vs Losses
Losses73.6 · Games = 5 · +7.8 vs Wins