Usage Score
10.3
Player Dossier
2012-2016Memphis
Daniel Montiel
TE • 6'3" • Arlington, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Daniel Montiel reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.6
Consistency
55.4
Season Value
60.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis
12131414151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Daniel Montiel, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis. Daniel Montiel reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Memphis paired 338 primary output with 77.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Memphis
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
30.7
Efficiency
77.6
Usage
10.3
Consistency
55.4
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 34. Unknown: 6. Kansas: 6. Bowling Green: 34. Ole Miss: 22. Temple: 29. Tulane: 9. Tulsa: 38. SMU: 45. South Florida: 100. Cincinnati: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 40. Kansas: 1 by 40. Bowling Green: 3 by 75.6. Ole Miss: 1 by 100. Temple: 2 by 96.7. Tulane: 1 by 60. Tulsa: 1 by 100. SMU: 4 by 75. South Florida: 10 by 66.7. Cincinnati: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins23 · n=6 · -25.5 vs Losses
Losses48.5 · n=4 · +25.5 vs Wins
First Half21.8 · n=6 · -19.6 vs Second Half
Second Half41.4 · n=5 · +19.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/21 | @ Western Kentucky | L 31-51 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Cincinnati | W 34-7 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | L 42-49 | — | 10 | 100 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ SMU | W 51-7 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Tulsa | L 30-59 | — | 1 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Tulane | W 24-14 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 10/7 | vs Temple | W 34-27 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Ole Miss | L 28-48 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Bowling Green | W 77-3 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Kansas | W 43-7 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201320142014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Memphis | 124 | 69.2 | 9 | 124 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Memphis | 124 | 69.2 | 9 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Memphis | 155 | 82.6 | 7.1 | 31 |
| 2016 Postseason | Memphis | 338 | 77.6 | 10.3 | 183 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 338 | 77.6 | 10.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84
Primary metric
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Navy
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
100
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Kentucky
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Memphis
338 primary output · 77.6 efficiency · 10.3 usage
60.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Memphis
60.8
338 primary · 77.6 efficiency · 10.3 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Memphis
49
155 primary · 82.6 efficiency · 7.1 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7585
Arlington · Arlington, TX
- Committed To
- Memphis
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
617
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.