Player Stats

Paxton Lynch College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
9,550
Passing yards
8,863
Rushing yards
687
Touchdowns
76

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonMemphis00000-
2013 Regular SeasonMemphis122,1832,0561271160.4
2014 PostseasonMemphis1334430638769.3
2014 Regular SeasonMemphis133,0082,7252832869.3
2015 PostseasonMemphis13105106-1070.2
2015 Regular SeasonMemphis133,9103,6702403070.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Memphis paired 4,015 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 66.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Memphis

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

308.8

Efficiency

66.7

Usage

16.7

Consistency

76.9

Best Game by takeover score

Cincinnati

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 105. Missouri State: 105. Kansas: 368. Bowling Green: 403. Cincinnati: 464. South Florida: 311. Ole Miss: 387. Tulsa: 453. Tulane: 386. Navy: 329. Houston: 321. Temple: 154. SMU: 229

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 42 by 39.1. Missouri State: 15 by 77.7. Kansas: 31 by 77.8. Bowling Green: 47 by 69.3. Cincinnati: 47 by 77.3. South Florida: 42 by 61.1. Ole Miss: 61 by 57.5. Tulsa: 46 by 71.8. Tulane: 49 by 72.8. Navy: 49 by 61.8. Houston: 44 by 64.9. Temple: 42 by 52.9. SMU: 15 by 83.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins345.1 · Games = 9 · +117.9 vs Losses
Losses227.3 · Games = 4 · -117.9 vs Wins