Usage Score
4.1
Player Dossier
2012-2016Memphis
DB • 5'10" • Davie, FL, USA
Chauncey Lanier shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
4.1
Efficiency
20.8
Consistency
64.8
Season Value
29
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chauncey Lanier, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Memphis. Chauncey Lanier shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Memphis paired 10 primary output with 20.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
20.8
Usage
4.1
Consistency
64.8
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 1. Unknown: 0. Kansas: 1. Bowling Green: 0. Ole Miss: 2. Temple: 1. Tulane: 1. Navy: 0. Tulsa: 1. SMU: 1. South Florida: 1. Cincinnati: 0. Houston: 1
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 4 by 26.7. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Kansas: 1 by 14.2. Bowling Green: 2 by 8.3. Ole Miss: 6 by 45. Temple: 5 by 30.8. Tulane: 4 by 26.7. Navy: 2 by 8.3. Tulsa: 5 by 30.8. SMU: 2 by 18.3. South Florida: 3 by 22.5. Cincinnati: 1 by 4.2. Houston: 2 by 18.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
45 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/21 | @ Western Kentucky | L 31-51 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Houston | W 48-44 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Cincinnati | W 34-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | vs South Florida | L 42-49 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ SMU | W 51-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Tulsa | L 30-59 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Navy | L 28-42 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Tulane | W 24-14 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 10/7 | vs Temple | W 34-27 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Ole Miss | L 28-48 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Bowling Green | W 77-3 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Kansas | W 43-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Memphis
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Memphis | 10 | 20.8 | 4.1 | 10 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 10 | 20.8 | 4.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.6 takeover score.
#2
Temple
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 32.5 takeover score.
#3
Tulsa
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28.1 takeover score.
#4
Western Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 27.5 takeover score.
#5
South Florida
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Memphis
10 primary output · 20.8 efficiency · 4.1 usage
29
#2
2016 Regular Season · Memphis
29
10 primary · 20.8 efficiency · 4.1 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Memphis
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7483
Nova · Fort Lauderdale, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
41
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chauncey Lanier quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit